EGALCHAIN · EVERYTHING THE PROTOCOL ALREADY DOES · UNDER CONSTRUCTION

A cooperative bank for the world. Here, plainly, is everything it already does.

Not the way you'd talk to an engineer, not the way you'd talk to an investor. To you: what each mechanism does for a real human, how it is built, and why.

Billions of people live under monetary decisions they don't make. Those decisions are taken elsewhere, by people they don't know, in institutions that don't represent them and never pay the price. EgalChain hands that sovereignty back, and carves it into the code so it can't be taken again. Including from its founder.

EgalChain is not a product being sold to you. It is infrastructure, like a road or a water network. I'll describe the whole cathedral: what it does, and what it is built to become. And at every stone I'll tell you where the work stands: what already runs on the test network, what waits for the audit, what is not yet standing. The cathedral is real. The work is too.

I explain the idea and the reason behind each thing, never the exact recipe — for a reason I give you plainly further down.

Current block
Network
Test network
Reserve behind credit
333% behind every loan, a margin against collapse
Humanitarian share
5% out of the vote's reach
01 · The money

Money no one can quietly inflate.

EgalChain has two currencies, on purpose. The first, EGL, is the reserve currency: the bedrock, rare. You create it by running a computation on an ordinary computer, not an expensive specialized machine — your laptop is enough. (The people who run that computation and keep the network standing are the miners.) Its quantity declines slowly, under a public rule known in advance. No one can print it in secret to plug a hole.

The second, ES (for Egal-Stable), is the everyday money: the one you pay with, send home to your family, borrow. It aims at stability. The idea is old — it is Bretton Woods: a working currency backed by a reserve. Here, behind every ES created by a loan, the protocol demands more than three times its value in already-accumulated EGL, held in reserve — a deliberate margin, because a bank that lends more than it can cover is exactly how trust collapses. Not a promise of a reserve: a reserve anyone can recount, at any moment.

The digital currencies called "stablecoins" you may have heard of are, for the most widespread ones, accounts kept by a private company that can freeze them on a government's simple request. ES is backed by no company and has no guaranteed parity with any dollar: it is backed by EGL, mined by ordinary people, under a rule no one holds in their hand.

And here is the gesture that matters most, the one already public. On every coin created, the miner who finds it keeps only a third. The rest goes elsewhere: a little over half funds the cooperative credit, the loans banks give no one; a share is split among everyone who keeps the network running; and five percent goes, automatically and forever, to a humanitarian fund.

I carved the share of the weakest into the compiler, not into our good intentions, so that no majority, no governor, no future version of myself could ever vote it somewhere else.

To be exactWhat is out of the vote's reach is those two shares — the humanitarian and the dividend — and the reserve floor. The split between the miner and the community stays adjustable by the community, but only between bounds the code refuses to cross. Nothing would stop a group, in theory, from leaving one day to found its own chain with other rules; but that would happen in the open, a visible and costly departure, never a number moved in silence. That is the exact meaning of incorruptible: by the vote, not by secession.
02 · The value of EGL

EGL: what it is, and where its value comes from.

ES is the everyday money. Beneath it sits EGL, the rare asset everything rests on. It is worth saying honestly where its value comes from, because that is exactly where other digital currencies, the ones people call "crypto," lie most.

EGL is not a coin that exists only to be traded. It is the reserve. Each time ES is created by converting it from EGL, that EGL is locked in reserve: it is not destroyed, it is set aside, and it stays there as long as the matching ES exists. The more ES is used as money, the more EGL is held behind it. EGL's role grows, mechanically, with real network use.

Its issuance runs the other way. The network creates 50 EGL per block at the start, and that figure declines gently, by about five percent a year, on a soft slope, without the brutal cliff seen elsewhere. It settles onto a tiny but permanent floor: a fraction of EGL per block, forever, just enough to keep people securing the chain. Because that floor is fixed while the quantity already created keeps growing, the share of new money created each year tends, over time, toward almost nothing.

And EGL did not come from nothing: producing it costs real computational work, on ordinary processors. It does real things in the network: it backs credit, it weighs in votes, it anchors settlement. Its value comes from what it does in the network.

And here is where I stop, on purpose. Every other project would tell you, right here: "utility rises, supply dries up, so buy before it climbs." I will not say it. The price of an asset depends on a market no one controls, and promising you a rising curve would be exactly the lie I refuse. What I can do is show you the foundations — real utility, an issuance that fades, a reserve that thickens with use — and let you judge. An honest institution describes what it builds. It does not sell you a way in.

To be exact"Almost nothing" does not mean a fixed maximum number: there will always be that small permanent issuance, so the supply keeps growing, very slowly, with no hard ceiling. It is the rate of creation that fades, not the creation itself. And a real cost of production sets no market price: it says where EGL comes from, nothing more.
03 · Running the network

Who keeps the network running, and what the network gives back.

A network like EgalChain stands because people give it the processing power of their computers. That is what mining is: running a computation that secures the chain and validates blocks. The first thing to say, and it counts: it stays within reach of an ordinary computer. The computation is built to run on a consumer processor and to resist the expensive specialized machines. No million-euro farm is needed to have a chance: a laptop, a desktop, a small cooperative is enough. That is a choice, not an accident. If mining demanded unreachable hardware, money creation would concentrate in a few hands — the exact opposite of what is being built.

What the network gives back to those who keep it running comes from several sources, and none of it is money out of nowhere. None of it is a promised yield either: each one depends on the network's real activity, which today runs on the test network, and can be worth zero.

The block's share. Whoever solves a block receives a third of its issuance. The rest you already know: the community, the shared dividend, the humanitarian fund.

The shared dividend. A tenth of each block goes into a common pot, redistributed among those who have mined recently, pro-rata to their work, but with a cap so a big miner can't take it all. Steady participation counts, not just the luck of landing a block.

Credit interest. When borrowers repay the interest on their loans, most of it returns to miners. The more cooperative credit is used, the more those who secure the network find in it: security and usefulness pull the same way.

Savings that work. Whoever locks up ES can receive a share of the network's real activity: a slice of the treasury, the guarantee fund's overflow when it spills over, a share of fees. That income exists only if the network is genuinely used, and is worth zero otherwise. No printing press behind it.

Usage fees. Each ES transfer takes a small commission: one half reinforces the guarantee fund, the other goes to savers. Everyday use funds the soundness of the system.

To be exactWhat a miner earns depends on the difficulty of the moment, on real activity, and on issuance, which declines over time. No one is earning anything for real yet: we are on the test network.
04 · Cooperative credit

Credit you earn, not credit you inherit.

Billions of people have no file, no statements, no banking past — not because they aren't reliable, but because no one ever opened the door.

On the borrower's side

The lending protocols you find elsewhere ask you to already own, as collateral, more than you borrow. That is the exact opposite of what someone with nothing needs. Here, the question isn't "what did you prove yesterday?" but "who vouches for you, now?". A person who doesn't mine — a seamstress, a village cooperative, a migrant — publishes a request: an amount, a project, a repayment schedule they choose themselves. Six people who keep the network running can vouch for them. Their commitment alone opens the loan. No risk committee decides in their place.

A bank asks you to prove you don't need it; here, it's enough that six people say "I'll answer for you."

Their word isn't idle: each block, the protocol takes a share of those six guarantors' earnings to feed the loan, on its own, without any of them having to think about it again. Solidarity becomes mechanical, impossible to dodge. The borrowed money lives in a transparent wallet the six guarantors see in full — what comes in, what goes out, with a justification for each spend. That is what lets six strangers trust a seventh: not a promise, open accounting. And when the borrower repays, her money first erases the real debt, the principal, before paying the rent on the money: she frees herself for good, she doesn't pay eternal interest on a debt that never falls.

On the lender's side

Someone has to answer for the borrower, and that is where a miner can do more than secure the network: they can lend. Vouching means putting your own skin in the game, proposing a rate and committing to hold it. Each proposes their own, freely, but inside a corridor the community fixes, neither usurious nor giveaway; and it's never one lender's rate that applies, it's the middle one across the six, so no isolated lender dictates the price. A miner can back several borrowers at once, within a chosen limit, to spread their commitment rather than stake everything on one person. They can even take the lead: rather than wait for a request, publish a credit offer and stand as its first guarantor. The offer goes looking for whoever needs it.

When the borrower repays, the interest returns to the six guarantors in equal shares. And trust builds both ways: each loan carried to term raises the guarantor's reputation a notch, slowly, and it can't be bought. But the reverse is true too: if the borrower defaults, the guarantor loses part of what they staked. Vouching is a real risk, never a safe investment.

To be exactWhen a default happens, a shared cushion returns a fraction of the guarantor's stake; the rest is a loss they bear. And none of this conjures magic money: every ES lent is backed by real EGL set in reserve, so one borrower's credit does not devalue everyone else's money. No one has borrowed or lent a cent for real yet: we are on the test network.
05 · Saving, welcoming institutions

Savings that earn a real income, and a door for institutions.

Locking part of your ES means building savings without a bank, savings that earn a real income. Real meaning it doesn't come from a printing press that dilutes everyone, but from network activity: a slice of the treasury, the guarantee fund's overflow, a share of fees. If the network is used, the saver earns; if not, nothing. No yield is promised, and that is precisely what makes it honest.

A withdrawal isn't instant: there is a delay, on the order of a month, before locked savings are released. It is a constraint, and it protects everyone: it stops a few from pulling everything out at the first scare and draining the protection layer exactly when it is needed most. It is the cooperative equivalent of a notice period. And the committed saver isn't just a depositor: above a certain threshold, they earn the right to vote on the protocol's settings, on the same footing as a miner. It's an entry threshold, not power you buy: stacking ten times more savings doesn't weigh more.

Letting institutions in, without breaking equality

A bank, a cooperative, a data center can join the network with its real infrastructure — hundreds of machines under one identified responsibility. But on two conditions written into the code: a verified identity behind the entity, and a double consent for each attached machine — the master invites, the machine accepts, you don't attach someone else's machine by force. The network doesn't read the contents of the legal documents itself; it anchors their fingerprint, binds the entity's responsibility, and regular audits, visible to all, do the rest. It's the entry door designed for counterparts like a central bank, without giving up transparency, and without a class apart: an entity has the same kind of account as anyone.

One thing I won't tell youThis savings has sometimes been described as "insurance" where the saver's capital would be tapped to cover loan defaults. The code does not do that: savings strengthen the soundness calculation and earn an income, but they are not exposed to seizure. I would rather tell you that than let you believe in a mechanism that doesn't exist. And all of this, again, runs on the test network.
06 · Deciding together

A democracy in three storeys.

EgalChain has no board of directors. Decisions are taken at three levels, and every voice is tied to a unique identity so no one can cheat by multiplying themselves.

The voice of humanity

Any verified person can put a question to the world — "should there be a basic income?" — and everyone answers. The vote carries the person's country, never their name: the registry says "seventy-three countries represented" without saying who, at your place, ticked what. The question never closes, the result never erases, and questions can be linked to one another — a counter-question, a rephrasing, a sub-question — because a real debate isn't a string of yes/no but a conversation that branches. For the first time, you could see what the planet actually thinks, country by country, with no media filter and no rigged poll. (These are opinion registries: they don't change the protocol's rules by themselves. That's the storey below.)

Tuning the machine, without the biggest winning

Part of the protocol's settings can be changed by a vote, inside bounds the code refuses to cross. But a vote's weight isn't proportional to power. To weigh twice as much takes four times the force; to weigh three times as much, nine times. Influence rises far more slowly than power — that's what is called quadratic voting. A small miner keeps a real voice against a big farm, and a cooperative isn't drowned out by a giant.

The core, touched only with great difficulty

On a handful of fundamental rules — the money's backing, the split between the miner and the community — the vote changes nature: one miner, one voice, no weighting at all. It takes at least half taking part, an overwhelming three-quarters majority, then a delay of about a month before the change bites, during which an emergency brake can stop everything. You don't change the protocol's soul on a whim, and while the delay runs, the decision stays reversible.

I removed the box from the code that says "this one counts more," not out of virtue, but because an institution with no privileged few has no one to corrupt.

And if you have neither the time nor the wish to follow every technical setting, you can entrust your voice to someone you trust, then take it back whenever you want. That is liquid democracy: taking part without having to follow everything.

To be exactThese votes are only fully safe from cheating once the passport identity layer is active, and it is dormant today, waiting for the real network. And "it can't be changed" is never absolute: the deepest rules stay changeable, but only by a coordinated upgrade of the whole network, in the open.
07 · Funding the common good, proving the truth

Generosity counted in humans, and a memory that can't be erased.

Funding what many want, not what one can pay for

Five percent of every block, as we said, goes to a humanitarian fund. Here is how it decides. When a cooperative opens a project — a well, a school, a clinic — it isn't the size of the gifts that counts, it's their number. The common pool tops up more the more distinct supporters there are. Two hundred villagers each giving a small amount trigger a far larger match than one big donor, however generous.

Generosity isn't counted in euros given but in humans who stood up: three thousand people at five cents weigh more than one at fifty thousand — and it's the block's arithmetic, not a committee, that decrees it.

This mechanism exists elsewhere, where other platforms made it known. But always as a campaign a patron funds and can stop. Here it flows from the money itself, every block, with no backer to convince. And for a project to touch this common pool, it must first be endorsed by about fifty verified people, from at least two countries: the one thing a fraudster can't self-supply.

Proving a thing existed, before it's made to disappear

A journalist photographs a mass grave, a corruption contract. They write its digital fingerprint into the registry, with the date and their signature. The chain doesn't keep the document — a video, a file — but its unique fingerprint, like a seal proving a precise file existed without revealing its contents. The day a regime seizes their computer and denies the proof ever existed, the fingerprint is on thousands of machines, and no function exists to erase it or backdate it. It's open to anyone with a simple wallet, without even a verified identity, because those whom states have struck from the lists are precisely the ones whose testimony counts most.

Two twin registries: one counts humans without naming them, the other names proofs without being able to erase them — for those they would silence, and for those they would make us forget.

To be exactThree caveats. "Five percent forever" would be too strong: this share is safe from the governance vote, but could change through a coordinated upgrade of the whole network. EgalWitness does not say whether a testimony is true — it proves it existed on a date, not that it tells the truth; it is not a court. And the fingerprint is unerasable, but the file lives elsewhere: if no one hosts it anymore, the proof that it existed survives, but the file may become unreachable. The chain guarantees "this existed and I saw it," not "here is the file forever."
08 · Being recognized as a unique human

Proving you're a unique human, without telling anyone who you are.

For a voice to count once — so one human can't vote a thousand times or grab a thousand shares — you need something simple and very hard: to know there's a real human behind an account, and only one. Most systems handle this by making you prove who you are to them, and keeping the registry. Some will scan your iris in a proprietary orb; classic bank checks store your papers and judge you. EgalChain refuses that third party.

Here, it is the network itself that verifies your passport. It reads the chip, redoes the computation that proves a genuine state signed it, draws an anonymous fingerprint that says nothing about you, then forgets the document. Verify, then forget. What remains is a code proving that "a unique human from such-and-such country exists," without ever revealing which. Your real identity is stored nowhere.

And there are those their own country has struck from the world registry: the refugee, the stateless person, the dissident their state no longer wants. For them, no chip to read. They aren't shut out, even so. There, other already-verified humans attest that they exist and which country they come from, without any document ever being broadcast.

The network looks at your passport just long enough to believe you, then forgets it — and if your country has erased you from the world's registry, three humans who shook your hand are enough to give you back a voice.

That last door rests on the trust of real people: its guarantee is softer than mathematics, and we own that, because security must never be paid for by excluding the very person it's meant to serve. Finally, this identity is truly yours: with a secret phrase you alone keep, you can revoke it yourself if you believe you're compromised, without asking anyone's permission, and recover it later by re-presenting your passport. For a dissident, it's a switch no power holds in their place.

To be exactThis is not perfect cryptographic magic: during verification, the network sees the document pass for a brief instant before erasing it. That is a brief, bounded leak we disclose rather than hide. All of this is built, compiled, tested, but still dormant: it only switches on when the real network launches, and the test network runs today on a stripped-down version. I will not let you believe passports are already being verified for real.
09 · Institutional rails, transfers

Rails for institutions, and transfers for everyone.

What truly works, today

Anyone can send ES to anyone, including someone who doesn't have an account yet: a minimal account creates itself on receipt. A small commission is taken, and no operator pockets it: one half reinforces the guarantee fund, the other goes to savers. Your everyday transfer consolidates the common safety net.

And you don't have to take my word for what the network holds. Its full state — balances, reserves, down to the collateral deposited by the institutions that settle — is summed up each block into one fingerprint. A light wallet, in a plain browser, can download a compact proof, recompute that fingerprint itself, and compare it to the one carved into the block. The node you query can't fool you: the computation, you redo it. Anyone — a journalist, an auditor — can thus verify that an institution really holds the collateral it claims, trusting no one.

The institutional rails, in honest future tense

Settlement between large institutions remains, and here I speak in the future, frankly. EgalChain is built to welcome it (banks, payment processors), but under license and under guarantee, never in open access. The mechanism is built, verified by the network itself, tested. It sleeps, and that's on purpose: nothing can settle until the regulator's keys are in place, at a ceremony to come. This settlement power belongs to a regulator and is withheld from any commercial actor: the network flatly refuses a commercial operator's settlement order. A closed door in the code, not a stated intention. And until the regulator's keys are placed at that ceremony, no one settles at all. In return, each institutional settlement sends an amplified share of its fees back to the citizen and humanitarian pools. The idea is simple: that the arrival of big institutions funds the infrastructure of ordinary people, instead of enriching a private intermediary.

To be exactNo bank settles on EgalChain today, and the names you might expect are discussion targets, not partners in place. What already works: ES transfers and reserve verification, right now on the test network.
10 · One body, not ten products

All of this is not ten apps. It's one body.

Everything you've just read — the money, the credit, the vote, the proof you're a real person — is not a row of separate apps. It's one chain, one registry, one shared state. The same verified identity that opens credit for you gives you a voice in a vote and lets you back a humanitarian project. The same ledger holds everything.

It's the opposite of what crypto did. Over there, each piece is its own project: a token for the money, another for lending, another for governance, each with its team, its risk, its fragile bridges. You're asked to juggle ten assets and trust ten teams. Here, you neither choose nor juggle: your identity, your history, your savings live in one coherent system.

Everyone carved financial justice into products sold one by one; I wanted to make it one living body again, and to carve its heart into the compiler so that no one — not even me — could betray it in silence.

And this body belongs to no investor. No fundraising, no token sale, no venture capital to repay. And you'll be able to check: at the audit and the opening of the code, you'll find there's no pre-mined share reserved for a fund anywhere, no token sold in advance. EGL is born only of mining. No one is waiting, behind the scenes, to extract value off the backs of those who use it.

WHERE WE ARE

Honestly, what's left.

  • NetworkThe test network. Everything described here runs and verifies on it. The public network opens after the external audit.
  • Passport identityBuilt and tested, but dormant: it switches on when the real network launches. Meanwhile, the test network runs on a stripped-down version.
  • Institutional settlementReady and dormant. No bank settles today; nothing can until the regulator's keys are in place.
  • Mobile app2026.
  • WhitepaperThe document that explains the whole protocol: final review before publication.
  • External auditNot yet started. It's the last step before the public network.
TRANSPARENCY

Why the code isn't public yet.

The test network already runs, and its server answers read queries at testnet.egalchain.xyz: you can query it now. The signed node binaries will arrive with the key ceremony, so you can verify what you run.

But the source code and the whitepaper stay closed until the external audit and a stabilized public network. I would rather tell you the real reason, frankly: until the protocol is proven, I don't want its foundations — the guaranteed reserve, the proof that a human is unique, the governance — taken, broken, and used to deceive people by passing for what I'm building.

The day EgalChain stands on its own, everything will open. Not before.

PARTICIPATE

EgalChain needs your judgment.

The protocol holds because people verify it, contest it, testify on it. No one decides in your place.

The most documented projects, with the most verifiable proofs and charitable attestations, can be scams just as easily as projects worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize.

We place no limit on what can be proposed.
We trust you to follow your instinct: choose what seems right, real, and answers true problems you can help fix.

When the real network launches, a page will list everything waiting for a human hand.An identity revocation to contest. A project that about fifty verified people, from at least two countries, must validate before it receives a cent from the humanitarian fund. A testimony to re-read. A cooperative to recognize.

VERIFY FOR YOURSELF

What you can already check.

The whitepaper and the code come with the audit. In the meantime — without having to trust me.

CONSTITUTION The rules, annotated What the compiler protects, explained without jargon. Readable by someone who writes no code. Coming with the audit
VERIFICATION The binaries' fingerprint At deployment, each signed binary will be published with its fingerprint. You'll check your copy, no trust required. Not yet available
NETWORK Explore the test network See the chain for yourself; read-only, live. Open the explorer